Laser Skin Resurfacing

     
  Core Messages
Ablative laser skin resurfacing:
  • Significant improvement of facial rhytids, atrophic scars, and various epidermal/ dermal lesions is possible with pulsed high-energy CO2 or erbium laser tissue ablation.
  • The rate of complications is related to operator experience/technique and patient variables, especially in darker skin types (Fitzpatrick skin type IV–VI).
  • Transient hyperpigmentation is a common postlaser side effect that can be treated with a variety of topical bleaching or peeling agents.
Nonablative laser skin resurfacing:
  • Multiple nonablative laser, light sources, and radiofrequency devices can lead to collagen remodeling and effect improvement of rhytids and atrophic scars.
  • All nonablative systems incorporate a cooling device to protect the epidermis during laser irradiation. Side effects and complications of nonablative treatments are generally mild and transient and therefore can be used in all skin phototypes.
  • Intense pulsed light treatments are most effective for irregular skin pigmentation and least effective for dermal collagen remodeling.
  • Radiofrequency (RF) treatments are “color blind” and can be used to tighten skin and offer subtle collagen remodeling in all skin phototypes.
 
     
Introduction
The cutaneous application of laser technology was launched in 1959 with the development of the 694-nm ruby laser by Maiman [1]. Over the next two decades, the argon laser, used to treat vascular lesions, and the carbon dioxide (CO2) laser, used to vaporize epidermal and dermal lesions,became the focus of research and development [2]. Because these lasers yielded a high rate of hypertrophic scarring and pigmentary alteration due to excessive thermal injury to dermal tissue, their use in dermatology was limited. The theory of selective photothermolysis, developed by Anderson and Parrish in the early 1980s, literally transformed the field of cutaneous laser surgery by delivery of targeted thermal energy [3]. Laser surgery has since continued to be refined and is now considered an excellent, often primary, treatment choice for a wide variety of cutaneous applications.

The laser–tissue interaction first studied by Anderson and Parrish is based on three fundamental principles–wavelength, pulse duration, and fluence. The wavelength of emitted laser light is absorbed preferentially by a selected tissue target, or chromophore (e.g. hemoglobin, melanin, tattoo ink,water). Energy density (fluence) must be high enough to destroy the target within a set amount of time, also called pulse duration. The pulse duration ideally should be shorter than the target chromophore’s relaxation time (defined as the time required for the targeted site to cool to one half of its peak temperature immediately after laser irradiation). Optimization of these three parameters permits delivery of maximum energy to target structures with minimal collateral thermal damage.

The early argon and carbon dioxide lasers were continuous wave (CW) lasers, emitting a constant light beam with long tissue exposure durations, resulting in widespread thermal injury. Quasi-CW mode lasers, which shutter the CW beam into short segments, provided further refinement of this technology.As the thermal relaxation times of most chromophores are short, development of pulsed laser systems, which emit high-energy laser light in ultrashort pulse durations with relatively long time periods (0.1–1 s) between each pulse, marked a significant advancement in cutaneous laser surgery [4].

The use of lasers for aesthetic purposes has undergone exponential growth in the last decade to meet the demand for anti-aging technology. Currently, an abundance of laser and nonlaser technology exists for skin rejuvenation, scar revision, collagen tightening, and correction of cutaneous dyschromias. Treatment can be tailored to match the patient’s lifestyle and desired outcome (Table 7.1).

     
 
Table 7.1. Skin resurfacing laser and other systems. IPL intense pulsed light, RF radiofrequency, N/A not applicable

      System types    
      Ablative   Nonablative
      CO2 (10,600 nm)
Erbium (2,940 nm)
  Pulsed dye (585–595 nm)
Nd:YAG (1,320 nm)
Diode (1,450 nm)
Er :Glass (1,540 nm)
IPL (515–1,200 nm)
RF (N/A)
  Advantages   Best clinical outcomes

Single procedure
  No postoperative recovery

Minimal risk of side effects
  Disadvantages   Prolonged recovery

Increased side effects
  Subtle clinical effect

Multiple sessions required